Advertisement
BGS vs FSRCY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a StrongBuy and FSRCY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSRCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FSRCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BGS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FSRCY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
BGS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.46% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| BGS | FSRCY | BGS / FSRCY | |
| Capitalization | 899M | 1.78B | 51% |
| EBITDA | 173M | 517M | 33% |
| Gain YTD | -39.037 | -4.886 | 799% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.71 | 19.31 | 133% |
| Revenue | 2.06B | 1.23B | 168% |
| Total Cash | 41.1M | 434M | 9% |
| Total Debt | 2.12B | 296M | 716% |
BGS | FSRCY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BGS's Valuation (2) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FSRCY (18) in the null industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to FSRCY’s over the last 12 months.
BGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FSRCY (100) in the null industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to FSRCY’s over the last 12 months.
FSRCY's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGS (97) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FSRCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.
FSRCY's Price Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as BGS (94) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FSRCY’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.
FSRCY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGS (51) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FSRCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.
| BGS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
BGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with HAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then HAIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS | 100% | -3.55% | ||
| HAIN - BGS | 63% Loosely correlated | -5.45% | ||
| BYND - BGS | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| KHC - BGS | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| GIS - BGS | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| CAG - BGS | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||
FSRCY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSRCY has been loosely correlated with RELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSRCY jumps, then RELV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSRCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSRCY | 100% | N/A | ||
| RELV - FSRCY | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BGS - FSRCY | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.55% | ||
| TATYF - FSRCY | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LSF - FSRCY | 6% Poorly correlated | -6.48% | ||
| WLMIF - FSRCY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||