It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCAG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CAG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BGS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +1.15% price change this week, while CAG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -5.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.
BGS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
CAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 10, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
BGS | CAG | BGS / CAG | |
Capitalization | 899M | 14.2B | 6% |
EBITDA | 173M | 1.88B | 9% |
Gain YTD | -34.405 | -24.392 | 141% |
P/E Ratio | 25.71 | 14.48 | 178% |
Revenue | 2.06B | 12.2B | 17% |
Total Cash | 41.1M | 61.5M | 67% |
Total Debt | 2.12B | 9.07B | 23% |
BGS | CAG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BGS's Valuation (2) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CAG (4). This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.
BGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CAG (100). This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.
CAG's SMR Rating (85) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as BGS (96). This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.
CAG's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as BGS (65). This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.
CAG's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGS (53). This means that CAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.
BGS | CAG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago46% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago46% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago60% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago55% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago57% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 19 days ago49% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago77% | 9 days ago55% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | 1 day ago52% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago62% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
LEGR | 53.71 | 0.44 | +0.83% |
First Trust Indxx Invtv Tnsctn&Prcs ETF | |||
PJBF | 60.61 | 0.27 | +0.45% |
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | |||
WWJD | 34.10 | 0.15 | +0.44% |
Inspire International ETF | |||
MUNI | 51.28 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bd Actv ETF | |||
NHYM | 24.29 | N/A | +0.02% |
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with HAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then HAIN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BGS | 100% | +0.92% | ||
HAIN - BGS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
BYND - BGS | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
GIS - BGS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
KHC - BGS | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
CAG - BGS | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAG has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAG jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.