Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGRFX vs FSMAX
BGRFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BGRFX vs FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$105.57
Change-$0.03 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.06B
BGRFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGRFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGRFX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. BGRFX (3.74B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BGRFX: FSMAX (0.57) vs BGRFX (0.52). BGRFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BGRFX (31 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BGRFX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. BGRFX (1.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGRFX: FSMAX (0) vs BGRFX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.16 vs. BGRFX (-27.13). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.22 vs. BGRFX (-38.75).
| BGRFX | FSMAX | BGRFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.04 | 3,829% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.04 | 3,829% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.788 | 4.897 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.74B | 40.1B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.57 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.13 | 17.16 | -158% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.55 | 60.27 | -49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.75 | 24.22 | -160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.49 | 156.77 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers