BGPPF vs PROC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGPPF is a Hold and PROC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BGPPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePROC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BGPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PROC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
BGPPF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PROC (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -52.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +56.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.95%.
Reported Earning Dates
PROC is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+56.20% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| BGPPF | PROC | BGPPF / PROC | |
| Capitalization | 148M | 327M | 45% |
| EBITDA | -3.41M | 137M | -2% |
| Gain YTD | -99.899 | -80.467 | 124% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 5.71 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 406M | - |
| Total Cash | 68.1K | 20M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 398K | 288M | 0% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
BGPPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BGPPF and IRWD have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BGPPF and IRWD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BGPPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGPPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| IRWD - BGPPF | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.53% | ||
| SBFM - BGPPF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| PROC - BGPPF | 5% Poorly correlated | -6.47% | ||
| SEHCF - BGPPF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OPTHF - BGPPF | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.46% | ||
More | ||||
PROC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PROC has been loosely correlated with AVDL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PROC jumps, then AVDL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PROC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROC | 100% | -6.47% | ||
| AVDL - PROC | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| OPTN - PROC | 28% Poorly correlated | -10.29% | ||
| RMTI - PROC | 24% Poorly correlated | -5.32% | ||
| PBH - PROC | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
| NBIX - PROC | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.10% | ||
More | ||||