Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLTX vs NPFCX
BGLTX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts BGLTX vs NPFCX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Gr 2
Price$35.48
Change-$6.24 (-14.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets974.39M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$66.51
Change-$2.33 (-3.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
BGLTX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLTX vs. NPFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLTX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. BGLTX (974M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than BGLTX: NPFCX (0.34) vs BGLTX (0.00). BGLTX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: BGLTX (12 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than BGLTX (0.70). BGLTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLTX: NPFCX (250) vs BGLTX (25000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.67 vs. BGLTX (-0.29). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. BGLTX (-18.37).
| BGLTX | NPFCX | BGLTX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.47 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.47 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.239 | 1.526 | -540% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000000 | 250 | 10,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 974M | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.29 | 11.67 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.24 | 37.05 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.37 | 11.69 | -157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 271.52 | 114.67 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement