Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLKX vs RNPCX
BGLKX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts BGLKX vs RNPCX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Gr K
Price$35.49
Change-$6.25 (-14.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets821.89M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$69.20
Change-$2.46 (-3.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
BGLKX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLKX vs. RNPCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLKX is a Hold and RNPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. BGLKX (822M). RNPCX pays higher dividends than BGLKX: RNPCX (0.73) vs BGLKX (0.00). BGLKX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: BGLKX (9 years) vs RNPCX (24 years). RNPCX (1.05) is less costly to investors than BGLKX (0.70). BGLKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RNPCX (23.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLKX: RNPCX (250) vs BGLKX (10000000). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.39 vs. BGLKX (-0.28). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.57 vs. BGLKX (-18.38).
| BGLKX | RNPCX | BGLKX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.05 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.05 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.247 | 1.571 | -525% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 822M | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.73 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.28 | 12.39 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.24 | 39.55 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.38 | 14.57 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 122.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement