Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLCX vs CSUZX
BGLCX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLCX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureC
Price$11.97
Change-$2.65 (-18.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.13M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$25.59
Change+$0.25 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets986.79M
BGLCX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLCX vs. CSUZX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLCX is a Buy and CSUZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 987M vs. BGLCX (124M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLCX: CSUZX (2.19) vs BGLCX (0.66). BGLCX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLCX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLCX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLCX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLCX (1000). CSUZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.82 vs. BGLCX (-8.79). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 33.92 vs. BGLCX (0.32).
| BGLCX | CSUZX | BGLCX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.87 | 230% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.87 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.092 | 5.395 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 124M | 987M | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 2.19 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.79 | 13.82 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.90 | 23.62 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.32 | 33.92 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.97 | 95.56 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement