Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLCX vs CSUZX
BGLCX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLCX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureC
Price$14.31
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.98M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$24.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets935.44M
BGLCX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLCX vs. CSUZX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLCX is a Hold and CSUZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. BGLCX (136M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLCX: CSUZX (2.41) vs BGLCX (0.76). BGLCX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLCX (13 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLCX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLCX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLCX (1000). BGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.11 vs. CSUZX (5.48). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 36.76 vs. BGLCX (26.76).
| BGLCX | CSUZX | BGLCX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.87 | 230% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.87 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.421 | 8.677 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136M | 935M | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 2.41 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | 5.48 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.33 | 9.77 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.76 | 36.76 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.32 | 64.68 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers