Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs CSUZX
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
Price$15.02
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.24M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$25.63
Change+$0.18 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets994.35M
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. CSUZX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a Hold and CSUZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 994M vs. BGLAX (135M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: CSUZX (2.31) vs BGLAX (1.52). BGLAX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLAX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLAX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). BGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. CSUZX (2.65). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 40.98 vs. BGLAX (36.78).
| BGLAX | CSUZX | BGLAX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.87 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.87 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.008 | 13.089 | 107% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135M | 994M | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 2.31 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.09 | 2.65 | 343% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.53 | 37.05 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.78 | 40.98 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.49 | 74.18 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers