Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs CSUZX
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
Price$12.20
Change-$2.63 (-17.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.13M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$25.59
Change+$0.25 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets986.79M
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. CSUZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a Buy and CSUZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 987M vs. BGLAX (124M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: CSUZX (2.19) vs BGLAX (1.36). BGLAX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLAX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLAX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). CSUZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.82 vs. BGLAX (-7.74). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 33.92 vs. BGLAX (4.66).
| BGLAX | CSUZX | BGLAX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.87 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.87 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.172 | 5.395 | 96% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 124M | 987M | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 2.19 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.74 | 13.82 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.85 | 23.62 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.66 | 33.92 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.25 | 95.56 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement