Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs CSUZX
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
Price$11.69
Change+$0.07 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets114.77M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$24.49
Change+$0.14 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets986.79M
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. CSUZX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a Hold and CSUZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 987M vs. BGLAX (115M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: CSUZX (2.28) vs BGLAX (1.41). BGLAX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLAX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLAX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). CSUZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.95 vs. BGLAX (-9.37). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 29.13 vs. BGLAX (0.13).
| BGLAX | CSUZX | BGLAX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.87 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.87 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.776 | 0.865 | 90% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115M | 987M | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 2.28 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.37 | 10.95 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.39 | 16.22 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.13 | 29.13 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.02 | 98.91 | 49% |