Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs CSUZX
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
Price$15.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.09M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$25.61
Change+$0.06 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets970.84M
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. CSUZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a Buy and CSUZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 971M vs. BGLAX (135M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: CSUZX (2.33) vs BGLAX (1.53). BGLAX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLAX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLAX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). BGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.29 vs. CSUZX (5.88). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 34.00 vs. BGLAX (30.31).
| BGLAX | CSUZX | BGLAX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.87 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.87 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.856 | 13.001 | 107% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135M | 971M | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 2.33 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.29 | 5.88 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.95 | 23.86 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.31 | 34.00 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.52 | 85.39 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement