Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs CSUZX
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
Price$14.89
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.16M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$24.34
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. CSUZX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a Buy and CSUZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. BGLAX (133M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: CSUZX (2.25) vs BGLAX (1.47). BGLAX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLAX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLAX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). BGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.41 vs. CSUZX (6.84). CSUZX (30.41) and BGLAX (30.22) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BGLAX | CSUZX | BGLAX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.87 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.87 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.021 | 7.397 | 176% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133M | 1.02B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 2.25 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.41 | 6.84 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.62 | 18.67 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.22 | 30.41 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.26 | 84.71 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers