Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs CSUZX
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
Price$14.34
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets188.93M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$24.01
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets924.11M
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. CSUZX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a Buy and CSUZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 924M vs. BGLAX (189M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: CSUZX (2.42) vs BGLAX (1.46). BGLAX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLAX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). BGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.69 vs. CSUZX (10.38). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 37.35 vs. BGLAX (35.12).
| BGLAX | CSUZX | BGLAX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.87 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.87 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.507 | 5.941 | 143% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189M | 924M | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 2.42 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.69 | 10.38 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.99 | 13.97 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.12 | 37.35 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.44 | 63.88 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers