Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs CSUZX
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs CSUZX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
Price$14.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.61M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
Price$24.27
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets924.28M
BGLAX vs CSUZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. CSUZX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a Buy and CSUZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUZX has more cash in the bank: 924M vs. BGLAX (198M). CSUZX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: CSUZX (2.42) vs BGLAX (1.46). BGLAX was incepted earlier than CSUZX: BGLAX (14 years) vs CSUZX (11 years). BGLAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CSUZX (0.87). CSUZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLAX (78.00). CSUZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: CSUZX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). BGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.52 vs. CSUZX (7.62). CSUZX return over 5 years is better than : 36.67 vs. BGLAX (33.48).
| BGLAX | CSUZX | BGLAX / CSUZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.87 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.87 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.658 | 7.089 | 122% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 198M | 924M | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 2.42 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.52 | 7.62 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.87 | 15.06 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.48 | 36.67 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.96 | 64.39 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers