Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGLAX vs CSURX
BGLAX vs CSURX Comparison
Open Charts BGLAX vs CSURX
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
Price$14.35
Change+$0.06 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.45M
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure R
Price$24.31
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets935.44M
BGLAX vs CSURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGLAX vs. CSURX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLAX is a Hold and CSURX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSURX has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. BGLAX (132M). CSURX pays higher dividends than BGLAX: CSURX (1.89) vs BGLAX (1.45). BGLAX was incepted earlier than CSURX: BGLAX (14 years) vs CSURX (11 years). BGLAX (1.43) and CSURX (1.37) have similar cost to investors . CSURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. BGLAX (78.00). CSURX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGLAX: CSURX (0) vs BGLAX (1000). BGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.19 vs. CSURX (-0.49). CSURX (33.39) and BGLAX (32.72) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BGLAX | CSURX | BGLAX / CSURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.37 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.37 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.583 | 6.775 | 127% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132M | 935M | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.89 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.19 | -0.49 | -1,266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.05 | 13.09 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | 33.39 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.83 | 65.96 | 77% |