BGKKF
Price
$4.40
Change
+$0.10 (+2.33%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
8.95B
CFBK
Price
$22.97
Change
+$0.13 (+0.57%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
148.01M
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGKKF vs CFBK

Header iconBGKKF vs CFBK Comparison
Open Charts BGKKF vs CFBKBanner chart's image
Bangkok Bank Public
Price$4.40
Change+$0.10 (+2.33%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.95B
CF Bankshares
Price$22.97
Change+$0.13 (+0.57%)
Volume$28.21K
Capitalization148.01M
BGKKF vs CFBK Comparison Chart in %
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGKKF vs. CFBK commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGKKF is a Buy and CFBK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BGKKF: $4.40 vs. CFBK: $22.97)
Brand notoriety: BGKKF and CFBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGKKF: 12% vs. CFBK: 89%
Market capitalization -- BGKKF: $8.95B vs. CFBK: $148.01M
BGKKF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.95B. CFBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $148.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGKKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCFBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BGKKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CFBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BGKKF is a better buy in the long-term than CFBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFBK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CFBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BGKKF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CFBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFBK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGKKF($8.95B) has a higher market cap than CFBK($148M). CFBK has higher P/E ratio than BGKKF: CFBK (8.29) vs BGKKF (5.77). BGKKF YTD gains are higher at: 14.883 vs. CFBK (-8.844). CFBK has less debt than BGKKF: CFBK (122M) vs BGKKF (555B). BGKKF has higher revenues than CFBK: BGKKF (193B) vs CFBK (55.5M).
BGKKFCFBKBGKKF / CFBK
Capitalization8.95B148M6,045%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.883-8.844-168%
P/E Ratio5.778.2970%
Revenue193B55.5M347,748%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt555B122M454,918%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFBK: Fundamental Ratings
CFBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGKKFCFBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCCFF0.04N/A
+6.51%
Golden Cariboo Resources Ltd.
OTCM50.250.20
+0.40%
OTC Markets Group Inc.
ACSAF79.03N/A
N/A
ACS Actividades De Construccion Y Servicios SA
WNDLF95.21N/A
N/A
Wendel
HPQFF0.13-0.01
-4.57%
HPQ SILICON INC

BGKKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BGKKF and FRFC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BGKKF and FRFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGKKF
1D Price
Change %
BGKKF100%
N/A
FRFC - BGKKF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFBK - BGKKF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
CAIXY - BGKKF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
ISDAY - BGKKF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OTTW - BGKKF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
More

CFBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFBK has been loosely correlated with FCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFBK jumps, then FCCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFBK
1D Price
Change %
CFBK100%
+0.57%
FCCO - CFBK
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
HIFS - CFBK
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
WTFC - CFBK
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
CARE - CFBK
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
WASH - CFBK
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
More