Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGGSX vs FFAFX
BGGSX vs FFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BGGSX vs FFAFX
Baillie Gifford US Equity Growth I
Price$29.48
Change-$0.39 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$88.57
Change-$1.38 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
BGGSX vs FFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. BGGSX (19M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than BGGSX: FFAFX (0.54) vs BGGSX (0.00). BGGSX was incepted earlier than FFAFX: BGGSX (9 years) vs FFAFX (5 years). BGGSX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BGGSX (19.00). BGGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: BGGSX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. BGGSX (4.19). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.35 vs. BGGSX (-25.38).
| BGGSX | FFAFX | BGGSX / FFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.34 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.34 | 397% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.973 | 21.226 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.19 | 7.13 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.25 | 70.89 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.38 | 36.35 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement