Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGGKX vs RGACX
BGGKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BGGKX vs RGACX
Baillie Gifford US Equity Growth K
Price$31.16
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.08M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
BGGKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGGKX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGGKX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. BGGKX (21.1M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BGGKX: RGACX (0.07) vs BGGKX (0.00). BGGKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BGGKX (8 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BGGKX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BGGKX (19.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGGKX: RGACX (250) vs BGGKX (10000000). BGGKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.98 vs. RGACX (14.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. BGGKX (1.43).
| BGGKX | RGACX | BGGKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.94 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.143 | 14.044 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.1M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.98 | 14.08 | 277% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.90 | 41.19 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.43 | 41.95 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement