Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGGKX vs RGACX
BGGKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BGGKX vs RGACX
Baillie Gifford US Equity Growth K
Price$31.62
Change+$0.08 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.05M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
BGGKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGGKX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGGKX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. BGGKX (21M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BGGKX: RGACX (0.07) vs BGGKX (0.00). BGGKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BGGKX (8 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BGGKX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BGGKX (19.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGGKX: RGACX (250) vs BGGKX (10000000). BGGKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.01 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. BGGKX (-1.10).
| BGGKX | RGACX | BGGKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.94 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.571 | 15.516 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.01 | 17.83 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.99 | 58.53 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.10 | 40.02 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.93 | - |