BGFV vs CWH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGFV is a Hold and CWH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BGFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCWH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BGFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CWH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BGFV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BGFV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CWH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BGFV (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -5.10% price change this week, while CWH (@Specialty Stores) price change was -5.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
BGFV is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.
CWH is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+1.80% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| BGFV | CWH | BGFV / CWH | |
| Capitalization | 80.3M | 1.26B | 6% |
| EBITDA | 8.18M | 336M | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -52.816 | -41.624 | 127% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.84 | 50.82 | 59% |
| Revenue | 885M | 6.23B | 14% |
| Total Cash | 9.2M | 39.6M | 23% |
| Total Debt | 277M | 3.86B | 7% |
BGFV | CWH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BGFV's Valuation (1) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CWH (13). This means that BGFV’s stock grew similarly to CWH’s over the last 12 months.
CWH's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGFV (100). This means that CWH’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGFV’s over the last 12 months.
CWH's SMR Rating (94) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BGFV (96). This means that CWH’s stock grew similarly to BGFV’s over the last 12 months.
CWH's Price Growth Rating (91) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BGFV (93). This means that CWH’s stock grew similarly to BGFV’s over the last 12 months.
CWH's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BGFV (2). This means that CWH’s stock grew similarly to BGFV’s over the last 12 months.
| BGFV | CWH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 27 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 73% |
BGFV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BGFV and LESL have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BGFV and LESL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BGFV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGFV | 100% | -0.52% | ||
| LESL - BGFV | 30% Poorly correlated | +4.00% | ||
| BBY - BGFV | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.14% | ||
| ONEW - BGFV | 30% Poorly correlated | -5.00% | ||
| CWH - BGFV | 29% Poorly correlated | -5.64% | ||
| HZO - BGFV | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||
CWH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWH has been loosely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWH jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWH | 100% | -5.64% | ||
| RUSHB - CWH | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| GPI - CWH | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| AN - CWH | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| LAD - CWH | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| RUSHA - CWH | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
More | ||||