Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGFRX vs RGACX
BGFRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BGFRX vs RGACX
William Blair Growth R6
Price$14.02
Change-$0.34 (-2.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.46M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
BGFRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGFRX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGFRX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. BGFRX (240M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BGFRX: RGACX (0.07) vs BGFRX (0.00). BGFRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BGFRX (7 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than BGFRX (0.85). BGFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGFRX: RGACX (250) vs BGFRX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. BGFRX (-11.88). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.89 vs. BGFRX (-1.27).
| BGFRX | RGACX | BGFRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.94 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.94 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.743 | 16.752 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 240M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.88 | 6.14 | -194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.57 | 61.61 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.27 | 34.89 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement