Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCSX vs RERBX
BGCSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BGCSX vs RERBX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap I
Price$16.02
Change-$0.15 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.68M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$59.82
Change-$1.74 (-2.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
BGCSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCSX vs. RERBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCSX is a Hold and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. BGCSX (257M). BGCSX pays higher dividends than RERBX: BGCSX (9.81) vs RERBX (2.28). BGCSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BGCSX (9 years) vs RERBX (24 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than BGCSX (0.67). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BGCSX (23.00). BGCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: BGCSX (0) vs RERBX (250). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.71 vs. BGCSX (-89.52). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : -8.38 vs. BGCSX (-92.72).
| BGCSX | RERBX | BGCSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.56 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.56 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -74.778 | 5.577 | -1,341% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 257M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.81 | 2.28 | 430% |
| Returns for 1 year | -89.52 | 16.71 | -536% |
| Returns for 3 years | -89.58 | 21.65 | -414% |
| Returns for 5 years | -92.72 | -8.38 | 1,106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers