Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs TRCLX
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs TRCLX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$6.93
Change+$0.12 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.13M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.42
Change+$0.44 (+3.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.38M
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 60.4M vs. BGCDX (3.13M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: BGCDX (1.57) vs TRCLX (1.39). BGCDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: BGCDX (4 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. BGCDX (25.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: TRCLX (500000) vs BGCDX (10000000). BGCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.29 vs. TRCLX (41.88).
| BGCDX | TRCLX | BGCDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.03 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 2.10 | 512% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.616 | 27.083 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 500000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.13M | 60.4M | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.39 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.29 | 41.88 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.23 | 16.50 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -0.20 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement