Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs TRCLX
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs TRCLX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$7.23
Change-$0.03 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.28M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. BGCDX (3.28M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than BGCDX: TRCLX (1.64) vs BGCDX (1.00). BGCDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: BGCDX (5 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. BGCDX (25.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: TRCLX (500000) vs BGCDX (10000000). TRCLX (47.20) and BGCDX (46.90) have marching annual gain over last year.
| BGCDX | TRCLX | BGCDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.03 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 2.10 | 512% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.480 | 5.088 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 500000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28M | 66.9M | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.64 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.90 | 47.20 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.87 | 22.07 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -7.24 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement