Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs TRCLX
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs TRCLX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$7.06
Change-$0.29 (-3.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.2M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
BGCDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. BGCDX (3.2M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than BGCDX: TRCLX (1.49) vs BGCDX (0.97). BGCDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: BGCDX (5 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (1.73). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. BGCDX (25.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: TRCLX (500000) vs BGCDX (10000000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.04 vs. BGCDX (37.10).
| BGCDX | TRCLX | BGCDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.03 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 1.73 | 621% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.023 | 10.035 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 500000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.2M | 66.9M | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.49 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.10 | 50.04 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.69 | 28.71 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -9.00 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement