Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKTX
BGCDX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKTX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$7.25
Change+$0.02 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.29M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$57.51
Change+$0.28 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
BGCDX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. BGCDX (3.29M). FHKTX pays higher dividends than BGCDX: FHKTX (1.27) vs BGCDX (1.00). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: BGCDX (5 years) vs FHKTX (18 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). FHKTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCDX (25.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKTX (0) vs BGCDX (10000000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.15 vs. BGCDX (46.42).
| BGCDX | FHKTX | BGCDX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.43 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 1.43 | 752% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.769 | 7.394 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.29M | 1.79B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.27 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.42 | 55.15 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.18 | 63.91 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 1.22 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 180.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement