Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKTX
BGCDX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKTX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$6.99
Change-$0.04 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.15M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$52.79
Change-$0.12 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
BGCDX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. BGCDX (3.15M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: BGCDX (1.53) vs FHKTX (0.80). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: BGCDX (4 years) vs FHKTX (18 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). FHKTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCDX (25.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKTX (0) vs BGCDX (10000000). FHKTX (38.28) and BGCDX (37.11) have marching annual gain over last year.
| BGCDX | FHKTX | BGCDX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.43 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 1.43 | 752% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.552 | 39.028 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.15M | 1.74B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.80 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.11 | 38.28 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.83 | 67.60 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -1.77 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement