Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKIX
BGCDX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKIX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$5.89
Change-$0.04 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.69M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$44.00
Change-$0.60 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
BGCDX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. BGCDX (2.69M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: BGCDX (1.79) vs FHKIX (1.27). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: BGCDX (4 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). FHKIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCDX (25.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKIX (0) vs BGCDX (10000000). BGCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.31 vs. FHKIX (19.56).
| BGCDX | FHKIX | BGCDX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.90 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 0.90 | 1,194% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.047 | 15.604 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.69M | 1.24B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.27 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.31 | 19.56 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.68 | 31.31 | -37% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 3.51 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.41 | - |