Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKCX
BGCDX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKCX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$6.98
Change+$0.05 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.15M
Fidelity China Region
Price$51.03
Change+$0.65 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
BGCDX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. BGCDX (3.15M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: BGCDX (1.57) vs FHKCX (1.11). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: BGCDX (4 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). FHKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCDX (25.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKCX (0) vs BGCDX (10000000). BGCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.29 vs. FHKCX (44.31).
| BGCDX | FHKCX | BGCDX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 0.91 | 1,181% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.616 | 27.796 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.15M | 1.39B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.11 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.29 | 44.31 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.23 | 58.81 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 6.09 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers