Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKAX
BGCDX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKAX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$7.11
Change+$0.06 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.2M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.80
Change+$0.39 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
BGCDX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. BGCDX (3.2M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: BGCDX (1.53) vs FHKAX (0.88). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: BGCDX (4 years) vs FHKAX (18 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). FHKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCDX (25.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKAX (0) vs BGCDX (10000000). FHKAX (37.12) and BGCDX (35.88) have marching annual gain over last year.
| BGCDX | FHKAX | BGCDX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.18 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 1.18 | 911% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.139 | 39.234 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.2M | 1.74B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.88 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.88 | 37.12 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.96 | 68.35 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 4.43 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 118.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement