Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCBX vs TRCLX
BGCBX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts BGCBX vs TRCLX
Baillie Gifford China Equities Instl
Price$7.04
Change-$0.28 (-3.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.2M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
BGCBX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. BGCBX (3.2M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than BGCBX: TRCLX (1.49) vs BGCBX (0.88). BGCBX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: BGCBX (5 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). BGCBX (10.84) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (1.73). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. BGCBX (25.00). BGCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: BGCBX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.04 vs. BGCBX (37.13).
| BGCBX | TRCLX | BGCBX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.03 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.84 | 1.73 | 627% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.029 | 10.035 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.2M | 66.9M | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.49 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.13 | 50.04 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.48 | 28.71 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -9.00 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement