Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCBX vs FHKTX
BGCBX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts BGCBX vs FHKTX
Baillie Gifford China Equities Instl
Price$7.04
Change-$0.28 (-3.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.2M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$59.08
Change+$4.17 (+7.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
BGCBX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. BGCBX (3.2M). FHKTX pays higher dividends than BGCBX: FHKTX (1.15) vs BGCBX (0.88). BGCBX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: BGCBX (5 years) vs FHKTX (18 years). BGCBX (10.84) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). FHKTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. BGCBX (25.00). BGCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FHKTX: BGCBX (0) vs FHKTX (250). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.15 vs. BGCBX (37.13).
| BGCBX | FHKTX | BGCBX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.43 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.84 | 1.43 | 758% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.029 | 10.865 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.2M | 2.07B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.15 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.13 | 56.15 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.48 | 69.49 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -0.83 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 196.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement