BGC
Price
$9.47
Change
-$0.12 (-1.25%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.49B
30 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$114.66
Change
+$2.74 (+2.45%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.72B
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGC vs SF

Header iconBGC vs SF Comparison
Open Charts BGC vs SFBanner chart's image
BGC Group
Price$9.47
Change-$0.12 (-1.25%)
Volume$2.04M
Capitalization4.49B
Stifel Financial
Price$114.66
Change+$2.74 (+2.45%)
Volume$1.31M
Capitalization11.72B
BGC vs SF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGC vs. SF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGC is a StrongBuy and SF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BGC: $9.47 vs. SF: $114.66)
Brand notoriety: BGC and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGC: 74% vs. SF: 172%
Market capitalization -- BGC: $4.49B vs. SF: $11.72B
BGC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.49B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $11.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than BGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than BGC.

Price Growth

BGC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.87% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($11.7B) has a higher market cap than BGC($4.49B). BGC has higher P/E ratio than SF: BGC (31.57) vs SF (22.22). SF YTD gains are higher at: 9.528 vs. BGC (5.180). SF has less debt than BGC: SF (1.55B) vs BGC (1.92B). SF has higher revenues than BGC: SF (5.06B) vs BGC (2.53B).
BGCSFBGC / SF
Capitalization4.49B11.7B38%
EBITDA398MN/A-
Gain YTD5.1809.52854%
P/E Ratio31.5722.22142%
Revenue2.53B5.06B50%
Total Cash828MN/A-
Total Debt1.92B1.55B123%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGC vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
BGC
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5770
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2621
SMR RATING
1..100
5212
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6933
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGC's Valuation (30) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as SF (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BGC’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BGC (26) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to BGC’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGC (52) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGC’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BGC (60) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to BGC’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGC (69) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HERD42.510.39
+0.94%
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
DVQQ27.090.25
+0.92%
WEBs Defined Volatility QQQ ETF
FCOM71.300.35
+0.49%
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
PSWD37.35N/A
N/A
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Eq ETF
ARDC13.99-0.15
-1.06%
Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund

BGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGC has been loosely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGC jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGC
1D Price
Change %
BGC100%
-1.25%
MS - BGC
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
GS - BGC
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
SF - BGC
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
EVR - BGC
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
JEF - BGC
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
+2.45%
GS - SF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
EVR - SF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
RJF - SF
87%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
MS - SF
86%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
PIPR - SF
85%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
More