BGC
Price
$10.27
Change
-$0.13 (-1.25%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.87B
73 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$114.20
Change
-$1.70 (-1.47%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
11.67B
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGC vs SF

Header iconBGC vs SF Comparison
Open Charts BGC vs SFBanner chart's image
BGC Group
Price$10.27
Change-$0.13 (-1.25%)
Volume$2.69M
Capitalization4.87B
Stifel Financial
Price$114.20
Change-$1.70 (-1.47%)
Volume$925.38K
Capitalization11.67B
BGC vs SF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGC vs. SF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGC is a Hold and SF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BGC: $10.27 vs. SF: $114.20)
Brand notoriety: BGC and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGC: 89% vs. SF: 125%
Market capitalization -- BGC: $4.87B vs. SF: $11.67B
BGC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.87B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $11.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than BGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BGC is a better buy in the short-term than SF.

Price Growth

BGC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.19% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($11.7B) has a higher market cap than BGC($4.87B). BGC has higher P/E ratio than SF: BGC (34.23) vs SF (22.13). BGC YTD gains are higher at: 13.832 vs. SF (8.653). SF has less debt than BGC: SF (1.52B) vs BGC (1.69B). SF has higher revenues than BGC: SF (5B) vs BGC (2.29B).
BGCSFBGC / SF
Capitalization4.87B11.7B42%
EBITDA360MN/A-
Gain YTD13.8328.653160%
P/E Ratio34.2322.13155%
Revenue2.29B5B46%
Total Cash966MN/A-
Total Debt1.69B1.52B111%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGC vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
BGC
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
879
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2220
SMR RATING
1..100
5812
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6727
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGC's Valuation (31) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as SF (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BGC’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BGC (22) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to BGC’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGC (58) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGC’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BGC (49) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to BGC’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGC (67) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFND43.380.28
+0.66%
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
EDGF24.83-0.02
-0.10%
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
FLQM55.93-0.16
-0.29%
Franklin US Mid Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
VIXY37.97-0.17
-0.45%
ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures
EPRF18.03-0.08
-0.46%
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Prfrd ETF

BGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGC has been loosely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGC jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGC
1D Price
Change %
BGC100%
-1.25%
MS - BGC
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
PIPR - BGC
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
GS - BGC
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
SF - BGC
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
EVR - BGC
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
-1.47%
EVR - SF
88%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
GS - SF
88%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
RJF - SF
87%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
MS - SF
86%
Closely correlated
-2.61%
JEF - SF
86%
Closely correlated
-2.37%
More