BGC
Price
$9.39
Change
-$0.06 (-0.63%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.84B
40 days until earnings call
GS
Price
$632.52
Change
-$2.22 (-0.35%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
134.2B
82 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BGC vs GS

Header iconBGC vs GS Comparison
Open Charts BGC vs GSBanner chart's image
BGC Group
Price$9.39
Change-$0.06 (-0.63%)
Volume$23.39K
Capitalization3.84B
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$632.52
Change-$2.22 (-0.35%)
Volume$25.86K
Capitalization134.2B
BGC vs GS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGC vs. GS commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGC is a Hold and GS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BGC: $9.46 vs. GS: $634.74)
Brand notoriety: BGC: Not notable vs. GS: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGC: 66% vs. GS: 236%
Market capitalization -- BGC: $3.84B vs. GS: $134.2B
BGC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.84B. GS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $134.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BGC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BGC and GS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BGC is a better buy in the short-term than GS.

Price Growth

BGC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.49% price change this week, while GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +11.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGC is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

GS is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.55% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($134B) has a higher market cap than BGC($3.84B). BGC has higher P/E ratio than GS: BGC (109.29) vs GS (18.08). GS YTD gains are higher at: 10.848 vs. BGC (4.415). BGC has less debt than GS: BGC (1.34B) vs GS (333B). GS has higher revenues than BGC: GS (46.3B) vs BGC (1.98B).
BGCGSBGC / GS
Capitalization3.84B134B3%
EBITDA215MN/A-
Gain YTD4.41510.84841%
P/E Ratio109.2918.08604%
Revenue1.98B46.3B4%
Total Cash656MN/A-
Total Debt1.34B333B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGC vs GS: Fundamental Ratings
BGC
GS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6926
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
305
SMR RATING
1..100
595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
467
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9965
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGC's Valuation (34) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GS (96) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BGC (30) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to BGC’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGC (59) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGC’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGC (46) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGC’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGC (99) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGCGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
78%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

BGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGC has been loosely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGC
1D Price
Change %
BGC100%
+1.50%
EVR - BGC
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
PIPR - BGC
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
MS - BGC
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
JEF - BGC
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
GS - BGC
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
More

GS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
+1.41%
SF - GS
77%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
PIPR - GS
76%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
EVR - GS
75%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
MS - GS
75%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
MC - GS
72%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
More