BGC
Price
$9.47
Change
-$0.12 (-1.25%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.49B
30 days until earnings call
CNSRF
Price
$13.40
Change
-$1.45 (-9.76%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
917.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGC vs CNSRF

Header iconBGC vs CNSRF Comparison
Open Charts BGC vs CNSRFBanner chart's image
BGC Group
Price$9.47
Change-$0.12 (-1.25%)
Volume$2.04M
Capitalization4.49B
Coinshares International
Price$13.40
Change-$1.45 (-9.76%)
Volume$2.02K
Capitalization917.81M
BGC vs CNSRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGC vs. CNSRF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGC is a StrongBuy and CNSRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BGC: $9.47 vs. CNSRF: $13.40)
Brand notoriety: BGC and CNSRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGC: 74% vs. CNSRF: 175%
Market capitalization -- BGC: $4.49B vs. CNSRF: $917.81M
BGC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.49B. CNSRF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $917.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCNSRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CNSRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNSRF is a better buy in the long-term than BGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNSRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CNSRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNSRF is a better buy in the short-term than BGC.

Price Growth

BGC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.87% price change this week, while CNSRF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -13.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGC($4.49B) has a higher market cap than CNSRF($918M). BGC has higher P/E ratio than CNSRF: BGC (31.57) vs CNSRF (8.19). CNSRF YTD gains are higher at: 76.316 vs. BGC (5.180). BGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 398M vs. CNSRF (125M). CNSRF has more cash in the bank: 1.47B vs. BGC (828M). CNSRF has less debt than BGC: CNSRF (72.2M) vs BGC (1.92B). BGC has higher revenues than CNSRF: BGC (2.53B) vs CNSRF (116M).
BGCCNSRFBGC / CNSRF
Capitalization4.49B918M489%
EBITDA398M125M318%
Gain YTD5.18076.3167%
P/E Ratio31.578.19386%
Revenue2.53B116M2,177%
Total Cash828M1.47B56%
Total Debt1.92B72.2M2,657%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGC: Fundamental Ratings
BGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGCCNSRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
36%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MVCKX33.310.40
+1.22%
MFS Mid Cap Value R6
TQSMX24.980.30
+1.22%
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
PWDIX10.530.12
+1.15%
Donoghue Forlines Dividend I
LGFEX21.770.20
+0.93%
Franklin International Equity FI
ADECX18.350.14
+0.77%
Columbia Intrinsic Value C

BGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGC has been loosely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGC jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGC
1D Price
Change %
BGC100%
-1.25%
MS - BGC
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
GS - BGC
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
SF - BGC
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
EVR - BGC
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
JEF - BGC
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
More

CNSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNSRF and AVFCF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNSRF and AVFCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNSRF
1D Price
Change %
CNSRF100%
N/A
AVFCF - CNSRF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGC - CNSRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
GSIW - CNSRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
ERNXY - CNSRF
15%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
BITF - CNSRF
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.22%
More