Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGAFX vs FNPFX
BGAFX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts BGAFX vs FNPFX
Baron Global Advantage Retail
Price$43.76
Change+$0.11 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets642.4M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.81
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
BGAFX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGAFX vs. FNPFX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGAFX is a Buy and FNPFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. BGAFX (642M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than BGAFX: FNPFX (0.78) vs BGAFX (0.00). BGAFX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: BGAFX (13 years) vs FNPFX (9 years). BGAFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. BGAFX (8.00). BGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: BGAFX (2000) vs FNPFX (1000000). BGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.31 vs. FNPFX (14.06). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.95 vs. BGAFX (5.85).
| BGAFX | FNPFX | BGAFX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.41 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.41 | 298% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.046 | 15.636 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 642M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.78 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.31 | 14.06 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.77 | 35.49 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.85 | 39.95 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 210.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement