Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGAFX vs CNPFX
BGAFX vs CNPFX Comparison
Open Charts BGAFX vs CNPFX
Baron Global Opportunity Retail
Price$46.26
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets665.32M
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.37
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
BGAFX vs CNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGAFX vs. CNPFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGAFX is a Hold and CNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. BGAFX (665M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than BGAFX: CNPFX (0.62) vs BGAFX (0.00). BGAFX was incepted earlier than CNPFX: BGAFX (13 years) vs CNPFX (23 years). BGAFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. BGAFX (8.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGAFX: CNPFX (250) vs BGAFX (2000). BGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.09 vs. CNPFX (12.86). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.93 vs. BGAFX (-0.66).
| BGAFX | CNPFX | BGAFX / CNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.84 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.84 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.507 | 19.226 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 665M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.62 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.09 | 12.86 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.52 | 63.24 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.66 | 36.93 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 247.57 | 110.65 | 224% |