Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFZ vs MUC
BFZ vs MUC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFZ vs. MUC commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFZ is a Hold and MUC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUC has more net assets: 1.12B vs. BFZ (363M). MUC has a higher annual dividend yield than BFZ: MUC (5.703) vs BFZ (1.901). BFZ was incepted earlier than MUC: BFZ (24 years) vs MUC (28 years). MUC (1.46) and BFZ (1.49) have comparable expense ratios . MUC has a higher turnover BFZ (48.00) vs BFZ (48.00).
| BFZ | MUC | BFZ / MUC | |
| Gain YTD | 1.901 | 5.703 | 33% |
| Net Assets | 363M | 1.12B | 32% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.46 | 102% |
| Turnover | 48.00 | 54.00 | 89% |
| Yield | 4.43 | 4.63 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BFZ | MUC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers