Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFZ vs MUC
BFZ vs MUC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFZ vs. MUC commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFZ is a Hold and MUC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUC has more net assets: 1.06B vs. BFZ (345M). MUC has a higher annual dividend yield than BFZ: MUC (0.641) vs BFZ (-2.268). BFZ was incepted earlier than MUC: BFZ (24 years) vs MUC (27 years). MUC (1.46) and BFZ (1.49) have comparable expense ratios . BFZ has a higher turnover MUC (59.00) vs MUC (59.00).
| BFZ | MUC | BFZ / MUC | |
| Gain YTD | -2.268 | 0.641 | -354% |
| Net Assets | 345M | 1.06B | 33% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.46 | 102% |
| Turnover | 65.00 | 59.00 | 110% |
| Yield | 5.01 | 4.87 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BFZ | MUC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers