Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFTUX vs RGAHX
BFTUX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BFTUX vs RGAHX
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth R6
Price$68.39
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets802.72M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.14
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
BFTUX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTUX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTUX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. BFTUX (803M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BFTUX: RGAHX (0.44) vs BFTUX (0.00). BFTUX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BFTUX (10 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BFTUX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BFTUX (19.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFTUX: RGAHX (250) vs BFTUX (5000000). BFTUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.54 vs. RGAHX (5.75). BFTUX return over 5 years is better than : 31.87 vs. RGAHX (23.10).
| BFTUX | RGAHX | BFTUX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.44 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.44 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.387 | 9.123 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 803M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.54 | 5.75 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 150.88 | 65.91 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.87 | 23.10 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement