Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFTUX vs RGACX
BFTUX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BFTUX vs RGACX
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth R6
Price$65.01
Change+$0.28 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets759.54M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
BFTUX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTUX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTUX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. BFTUX (760M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BFTUX: RGACX (0.07) vs BFTUX (0.00). BFTUX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BFTUX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than BFTUX (0.76). BFTUX (26.00) and RGACX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFTUX: RGACX (250) vs BFTUX (5000000). BFTUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.16 vs. RGACX (14.08). BFTUX (42.41) and RGACX (41.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BFTUX | RGACX | BFTUX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.94 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.684 | 14.044 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 760M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.16 | 14.08 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.22 | 41.19 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.41 | 41.95 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement