Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFTUX vs RGACX
BFTUX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BFTUX vs RGACX
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth R6
Price$66.72
Change+$1.22 (+1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets759.54M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
BFTUX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTUX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTUX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. BFTUX (760M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BFTUX: RGACX (0.07) vs BFTUX (0.00). BFTUX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BFTUX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than BFTUX (0.76). BFTUX (26.00) and RGACX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFTUX: RGACX (250) vs BFTUX (5000000). BFTUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.44 vs. RGACX (17.83). BFTUX return over 5 years is better than : 43.89 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| BFTUX | RGACX | BFTUX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.94 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.570 | 15.516 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 760M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.44 | 17.83 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.29 | 58.53 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.89 | 40.02 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement