Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFTUX vs GFACX
BFTUX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BFTUX vs GFACX
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth R6
Price$66.91
Change-$1.10 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets778.88M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.33
Change-$0.74 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
BFTUX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTUX vs. GFACX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTUX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. BFTUX (779M). BFTUX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFTUX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BFTUX (10 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than BFTUX (0.76). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BFTUX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFTUX: GFACX (250) vs BFTUX (5000000). BFTUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.02 vs. GFACX (6.90). BFTUX return over 5 years is better than : 30.71 vs. GFACX (10.69).
| BFTUX | GFACX | BFTUX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.35 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.35 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.786 | 1.530 | -51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 779M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.02 | 6.90 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 130.33 | 47.58 | 274% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.71 | 10.69 | 287% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers