Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFTHX vs RGEBX
BFTHX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts BFTHX vs RGEBX
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Retail
Price$62.31
Change+$1.01 (+1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets707.27M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$79.23
Change+$0.77 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
BFTHX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTHX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTHX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. BFTHX (707M). BFTHX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFTHX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: BFTHX (21 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than BFTHX (1.03). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BFTHX (13.38). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFTHX: RGEBX (250) vs BFTHX (2000). BFTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.08 vs. RGEBX (10.04). BFTHX (45.89) and RGEBX (45.69) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BFTHX | RGEBX | BFTHX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.09 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.09 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.953 | 10.904 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 707M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.08 | 10.04 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.22 | 57.17 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 45.69 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 230.03 | 78.56 | 293% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement