Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFTHX vs RGACX
BFTHX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BFTHX vs RGACX
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Retail
Price$63.78
Change+$0.68 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets759.54M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
BFTHX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTHX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTHX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. BFTHX (760M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BFTHX: RGACX (0.07) vs BFTHX (0.00). BFTHX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BFTHX (21 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BFTHX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). BFTHX (26.00) and RGACX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFTHX: RGACX (250) vs BFTHX (2000). BFTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.32 vs. RGACX (17.83). BFTHX (40.33) and RGACX (40.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BFTHX | RGACX | BFTHX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.94 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.94 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.523 | 15.516 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 760M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.32 | 17.83 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 105.15 | 58.53 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.33 | 40.02 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 257.51 | 95.93 | 268% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement