Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFTHX vs RGACX
BFTHX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BFTHX vs RGACX
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Retail
Price$65.50
Change-$0.77 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets772.71M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.65
Change-$0.31 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.36B
BFTHX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTHX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTHX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. BFTHX (773M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BFTHX: RGACX (0.07) vs BFTHX (0.00). BFTHX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BFTHX (21 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BFTHX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). BFTHX (26.00) and RGACX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFTHX: RGACX (250) vs BFTHX (2000). BFTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.83 vs. RGACX (10.09). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.57 vs. BFTHX (33.94).
| BFTHX | RGACX | BFTHX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.94 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.94 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.522 | 17.586 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 773M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.83 | 10.09 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 145.02 | 77.52 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.94 | 37.57 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 263.66 | 95.94 | 275% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement