BFST
Price
$26.72
Change
-$0.12 (-0.45%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
791.32M
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNSB
Price
$21.01
Change
-$0.10 (-0.47%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
157.5M
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFST vs MNSB

Header iconBFST vs MNSB Comparison
Open Charts BFST vs MNSBBanner chart's image
Business First Bancshares
Price$26.72
Change-$0.12 (-0.45%)
Volume$66.96K
Capitalization791.32M
MainStreet Bancshares
Price$21.01
Change-$0.10 (-0.47%)
Volume$11.33K
Capitalization157.5M
BFST vs MNSB Comparison Chart in %
BFST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFST vs. MNSB commentary
Dec 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFST is a StrongBuy and MNSB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BFST: $26.72 vs. MNSB: $21.01)
Brand notoriety: BFST and MNSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFST: 54% vs. MNSB: 28%
Market capitalization -- BFST: $791.32M vs. MNSB: $157.5M
BFST [@Regional Banks] is valued at $791.32M. MNSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $157.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $169.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFST is a better buy in the long-term than MNSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNSB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MNSB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNSB is a better buy in the short-term than BFST.

Price Growth

BFST (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.33% price change this week, while MNSB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFST is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

MNSB is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.29% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFST($791M) has a higher market cap than MNSB($158M). MNSB has higher P/E ratio than BFST: MNSB (14.13) vs BFST (10.32). MNSB YTD gains are higher at: 18.655 vs. BFST (5.702). MNSB has less debt than BFST: MNSB (69.8M) vs BFST (465M). BFST has higher revenues than MNSB: BFST (314M) vs MNSB (72.1M).
BFSTMNSBBFST / MNSB
Capitalization791M158M501%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.70218.65531%
P/E Ratio10.3214.1373%
Revenue314M72.1M436%
Total CashN/A20.9M-
Total Debt465M69.8M666%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFST vs MNSB: Fundamental Ratings
BFST
MNSB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5669
SMR RATING
1..100
2386
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
606
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BFST's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (52). This means that BFST’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

BFST's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (69). This means that BFST’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

BFST's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNSB (86). This means that BFST’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

MNSB's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFST (50). This means that MNSB’s stock grew similarly to BFST’s over the last 12 months.

MNSB's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFST (60). This means that MNSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFSTMNSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NESRF18.300.30
+1.67%
Northern Star Resources Ltd
MBOF38.600.21
+0.55%
Marine Bancorp of Florida, Inc.
QMCQF0.04N/A
N/A
QMC Quantum Minerals Corp.
TOSCF16.00N/A
N/A
Tosoh Corp.
PBTDF0.77N/A
N/A
PLOVER BAY TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

BFST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFST has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFST jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFST
1D Price
Change %
BFST100%
-0.45%
BY - BFST
87%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
UVSP - BFST
85%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
TRMK - BFST
83%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
FMBH - BFST
83%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
SSB - BFST
83%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
More

MNSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSB has been loosely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNSB jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSB
1D Price
Change %
MNSB100%
-0.47%
BY - MNSB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
FXNC - MNSB
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
PKBK - MNSB
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
CWBC - MNSB
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
BFST - MNSB
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
More