Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFSIX vs RWEBX
BFSIX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts BFSIX vs RWEBX
BFS Equity Institutional
Price$26.77
Change-$0.13 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.43M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.10
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
BFSIX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFSIX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFSIX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. BFSIX (64.4M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than BFSIX: RWEBX (0.79) vs BFSIX (0.17). BFSIX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: BFSIX (12 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). BFSIX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. BFSIX (16.10). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFSIX: RWEBX (250) vs BFSIX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. BFSIX (7.74). BFSIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.06 vs. RWEBX (35.86).
| BFSIX | RWEBX | BFSIX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.06 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.06 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.922 | 2.132 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 64.4M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.79 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.74 | 9.12 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.51 | 28.67 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.06 | 35.86 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.92 | 95.32 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers