BFS
Price
$33.31
Change
-$0.11 (-0.33%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
811.66M
61 days until earnings call
UHT
Price
$41.36
Change
+$0.41 (+1.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
573.83M
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFS vs UHT

Header iconBFS vs UHT Comparison
Open Charts BFS vs UHTBanner chart's image
Saul Centers
Price$33.31
Change-$0.11 (-0.33%)
Volume$66.36K
Capitalization811.66M
Universal Health Realty Income Trust
Price$41.36
Change+$0.41 (+1.00%)
Volume$110.46K
Capitalization573.83M
BFS vs UHT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFS vs. UHT commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFS is a StrongBuy and UHT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BFS: $33.31 vs. UHT: $41.36)
Brand notoriety: BFS and UHT are both not notable
BFS represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while UHT is part of the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFS: 114% vs. UHT: 176%
Market capitalization -- BFS: $811.66M vs. UHT: $573.83M
BFS [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $811.66M. UHT’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $573.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $116.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.36B. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $8.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUHT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UHT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFS is a better buy in the long-term than UHT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHT’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UHT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UHT is a better buy in the short-term than BFS.

Price Growth

BFS (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -2.52% price change this week, while UHT (@Managed Health Care) price change was +1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.43%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

UHT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.88% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Managed Health Care (+2.07% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFS($812M) has a higher market cap than UHT($574M). UHT has higher P/E ratio than BFS: UHT (32.06) vs BFS (25.23). UHT YTD gains are higher at: 15.248 vs. BFS (-9.689). BFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 172M vs. UHT (67.9M). UHT has more cash in the bank: 6.55M vs. BFS (5.3M). UHT has less debt than BFS: UHT (384M) vs BFS (1.57B). BFS has higher revenues than UHT: BFS (278M) vs UHT (98.6M).
BFSUHTBFS / UHT
Capitalization812M574M141%
EBITDA172M67.9M253%
Gain YTD-9.68915.248-64%
P/E Ratio25.2332.0679%
Revenue278M98.6M282%
Total Cash5.3M6.55M81%
Total Debt1.57B384M408%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFS vs UHT: Fundamental Ratings
BFS
UHT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6721
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
4370
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3760
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UHT's Valuation (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (38). This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UHT (100). This means that BFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than UHT’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's SMR Rating (43) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UHT (70). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.

UHT's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (60). This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UHT (60). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFSUHT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSMVX29.740.08
+0.27%
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value I2
TRGIX16.97N/A
N/A
Nuveen Core Equity Retire
BIEAX26.07N/A
N/A
Brandes International Equity A
NWAGX22.81N/A
N/A
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas A
SCCUX11.57-0.02
-0.17%
Invesco Income Advantage U.S. Fund C

BFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFS has been closely correlated with UE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFS jumps, then UE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFS
1D Price
Change %
BFS100%
-0.33%
UE - BFS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
LXP - BFS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
UHT - BFS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
NXRT - BFS
68%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
PECO - BFS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
More

UHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHT has been closely correlated with LXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UHT jumps, then LXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UHT
1D Price
Change %
UHT100%
+1.00%
LXP - UHT
67%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
PLYM - UHT
66%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
BFS - UHT
66%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
NXRT - UHT
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
FCPT - UHT
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More