Advertisement
BFS vs UHT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFS is a Buy and UHT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUHT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UHT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UHT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BFS (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +3.28% price change this week, while UHT (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was +3.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.63%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
BFS is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
UHT is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.37% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+1.65% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| BFS | UHT | BFS / UHT | |
| Capitalization | 791M | 560M | 141% |
| EBITDA | 173M | 68.1M | 254% |
| Gain YTD | 4.691 | 2.856 | 164% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.43 | 31.26 | 91% |
| Revenue | 283M | 99.4M | 285% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 4.32M | - |
| Total Debt | 1.59B | 387M | 410% |
BFS | UHT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BFS's Valuation (49) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UHT (53). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.
BFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UHT (100). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.
BFS's SMR Rating (47) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UHT (68). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.
UHT's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (54). This means that UHT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.
BFS's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UHT (46). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to UHT’s over the last 12 months.
| BFS | UHT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 51% | 10 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OEGAX | 28.44 | 0.11 | +0.39% |
| Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth A | |||
| FDVIX | 30.18 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl I | |||
| NESGX | 22.79 | -0.15 | -0.65% |
| Needham Small Cap Growth Retail | |||
| SBHIX | 26.29 | -0.26 | -0.98% |
| Saratoga Health & Biotechnology I | |||
| JRSNX | 12.22 | -0.14 | -1.13% |
| JH Adaptive Risk Mgd U.S. Eq N | |||
BFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFS has been closely correlated with LXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFS jumps, then LXP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFS | 100% | +1.44% | ||
| LXP - BFS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| NXRT - BFS | 68% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| KRG - BFS | 68% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| FRT - BFS | 68% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| STAG - BFS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.67% | ||
More | ||||
UHT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHT has been closely correlated with LXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UHT jumps, then LXP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UHT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UHT | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| LXP - UHT | 67% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| BFS - UHT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| PLYM - UHT | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| EGP - UHT | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| STAG - UHT | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.67% | ||
More | ||||