BFS
Price
$29.90
Change
+$0.28 (+0.95%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
723.09M
105 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRT
Price
$97.66
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.42B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFS vs FRT

Header iconBFS vs FRT Comparison
Open Charts BFS vs FRTBanner chart's image
Saul Centers
Price$29.90
Change+$0.28 (+0.95%)
Volume$200
Capitalization723.09M
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$97.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$2.89K
Capitalization8.42B
BFS vs FRT Comparison Chart in %
BFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFS vs. FRT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFS is a Buy and FRT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BFS: $29.62 vs. FRT: $97.65)
Brand notoriety: BFS and FRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFS: 134% vs. FRT: 90%
Market capitalization -- BFS: $729.93M vs. FRT: $8.42B
BFS [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $729.93M. FRT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $8.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFS is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BFS and FRT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BFS (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +1.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFS is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

FRT is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.44% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($8.42B) has a higher market cap than BFS($723M). BFS (25.98) and FRT (24.78) have similar P/E ratio . FRT YTD gains are higher at: -8.846 vs. BFS (-18.114). FRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 883M vs. BFS (172M). BFS has less debt than FRT: BFS (1.57B) vs FRT (4.57B). FRT has higher revenues than BFS: FRT (1.24B) vs BFS (278M).
BFSFRTBFS / FRT
Capitalization723M8.42B9%
EBITDA172M883M19%
Gain YTD-18.114-8.846205%
P/E Ratio25.9824.78105%
Revenue278M1.24B22%
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total Debt1.57B4.57B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFS vs FRT: Fundamental Ratings
BFS
FRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2012
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6149
SMR RATING
1..100
4265
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2476
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BFS's Valuation (26) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (75). This means that BFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (61). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's SMR Rating (42) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (65). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (61). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (76). This means that BFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFSFRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DISAX23.910.15
+0.63%
BNY Mellon International Stock Fund A
TRMVX29.030.17
+0.59%
SEI Large Cap Value F (SIMT)
HADUX81.510.29
+0.36%
Horizon Equity Premium Income Advisor
RGAFX89.29-0.01
-0.01%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
MSCDX18.78-0.03
-0.16%
MassMutual Small Cap Opps R5

BFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFS has been closely correlated with LXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFS jumps, then LXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFS
1D Price
Change %
BFS100%
-1.95%
LXP - BFS
69%
Closely correlated
-5.03%
UE - BFS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
FRT - BFS
69%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
NXRT - BFS
68%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
STAG - BFS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
More

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
-1.42%
KIM - FRT
87%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
KRG - FRT
87%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
REG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
AKR - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
BRX - FRT
83%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
More