BFS
Price
$32.65
Change
+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
795.58M
81 days until earnings call
BRT
Price
$15.05
Change
-$0.22 (-1.44%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
270.6M
One day until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFS vs BRT

Header iconBFS vs BRT Comparison
Open Charts BFS vs BRTBanner chart's image
Saul Centers
Price$32.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Volume$62.61K
Capitalization795.58M
BRT Apartments
Price$15.05
Change-$0.22 (-1.44%)
Volume$25.59K
Capitalization270.6M
BFS vs BRT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFS vs. BRT commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFS is a Hold and BRT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BFS: $32.65 vs. BRT: $15.05)
Brand notoriety: BFS and BRT are both not notable
BFS represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while BRT is part of the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFS: 98% vs. BRT: 78%
Market capitalization -- BFS: $795.58M vs. BRT: $270.6M
BFS [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $795.58M. BRT’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $270.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $27.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.31B. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBRT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BRT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BFS and BRT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BRT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BFS is a better buy in the short-term than BRT.

Price Growth

BFS (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.15% price change this week, while BRT (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +1.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.90%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

BRT is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.35% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Media Conglomerates (-0.15% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFS($796M) has a higher market cap than BRT($271M). BRT has higher P/E ratio than BFS: BRT (87.75) vs BFS (24.73). BFS YTD gains are higher at: -11.478 vs. BRT (-14.025). BRT has less debt than BFS: BRT (483M) vs BFS (1.55B).
BFSBRTBFS / BRT
Capitalization796M271M294%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.478-14.02582%
P/E Ratio24.7387.7528%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.55B483M320%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFS vs BRT: Fundamental Ratings
BFS
BRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6311
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6047
SMR RATING
1..100
4192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
357
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRT's Valuation (13) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BFS (36) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BRT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

BRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BFS (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BRT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's SMR Rating (41) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRT (92) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRT’s over the last 12 months.

BRT's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BFS (75) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BRT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

BRT's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BFS (35) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BRT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFSBRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RBGLY14.920.02
+0.13%
Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc.
DMZPY5.86N/A
N/A
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
GNSMF0.07N/A
N/A
MOROCCO STRATEGIC MINERALS CORP.
BLUAF10.90N/A
N/A
BlueRiver Acquisition Corp.
ATZAF55.23-0.62
-1.11%
Aritzia Inc.

BFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFS has been closely correlated with UE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFS jumps, then UE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFS
1D Price
Change %
BFS100%
+0.15%
UE - BFS
70%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
LXP - BFS
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
UHT - BFS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
NXRT - BFS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
PECO - BFS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
More

BRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRT has been loosely correlated with BFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRT jumps, then BFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRT
1D Price
Change %
BRT100%
-1.44%
BFS - BRT
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
NXRT - BRT
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
UHT - BRT
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
VRE - BRT
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
LXP - BRT
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More