BFRG vs CTEV
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFRG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCTEV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BFRG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CTEV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFRG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTEV’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BFRG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
- CTEV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BFRG (@Packaged Software) experienced а -22.10% price change this week, while CTEV (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
BFRG is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.38% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| BFRG | CTEV | BFRG / CTEV | |
| Capitalization | 22.9M | 532M | 4% |
| EBITDA | -4.56M | 652M | -1% |
| Gain YTD | -29.500 | 35.250 | -84% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 6.31 | - |
| Revenue | 75K | 962M | 0% |
| Total Cash | 3.86M | 71.5M | 5% |
| Total Debt | 213K | 4.57B | 0% |
| BFRG | CTEV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | N/A |
BFRG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFRG has been loosely correlated with AI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BFRG jumps, then AI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFRG | 100% | -14.02% | ||
| AI - BFRG | 36% Loosely correlated | -7.69% | ||
| NTCT - BFRG | 36% Loosely correlated | -6.44% | ||
| BB - BFRG | 35% Loosely correlated | -7.37% | ||
| CERT - BFRG | 35% Loosely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| SDGR - BFRG | 35% Loosely correlated | -5.08% | ||
More | ||||
CTEV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTEV has been loosely correlated with UBER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTEV jumps, then UBER could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTEV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTEV | 100% | -2.44% | ||
| UBER - CTEV | 33% Loosely correlated | -6.24% | ||
| BFRG - CTEV | 33% Loosely correlated | -14.02% | ||
| TDOC - CTEV | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.34% | ||
| PAYS - CTEV | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.79% | ||
| TGL - CTEV | 32% Poorly correlated | -17.39% | ||
More | ||||