Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFOR vs SCHM
BFOR vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts BFOR vs SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$29.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
Volume$934.3K
Net Assets12.07B
BFOR vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFOR vs. SCHM commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFOR is a Buy and SCHM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.1B vs. BFOR (179M). BFOR has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: BFOR (9.344) vs SCHM (7.570). BFOR was incepted earlier than SCHM: BFOR (12 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than BFOR (0.65). BFOR has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| BFOR | SCHM | BFOR / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 9.344 | 7.570 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 179M | 12.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,625% |
| Turnover | 90.00 | 13.00 | 692% |
| Yield | 0.62 | 1.43 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BFOR | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 9 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BFOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFOR has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFOR jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFOR | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| SYF - BFOR | 75% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| BY - BFOR | 73% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| ESAB - BFOR | 72% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| HUBB - BFOR | 72% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| PLAB - BFOR | 71% Closely correlated | -1.28% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
More | ||||