Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFOR vs SCHM
BFOR vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts BFOR vs SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$31.83
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
Volume$1.15M
Net Assets13.01B
BFOR vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFOR vs. SCHM commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFOR is a Hold and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 13B vs. BFOR (197M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than BFOR: SCHM (5.653) vs BFOR (3.918). BFOR was incepted earlier than SCHM: BFOR (13 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than BFOR (0.65). BFOR has a higher turnover SCHM (17.00) vs SCHM (17.00).
| BFOR | SCHM | BFOR / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 3.918 | 5.653 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 197M | 13B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,625% |
| Turnover | 90.00 | 17.00 | 529% |
| Yield | 0.60 | 1.46 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BFOR | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 76% | 15 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||