BFNH
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.09 (-13.04%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
20.11M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CFEIY
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
5.06B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFNH vs CFEIY

Header iconBFNH vs CFEIY Comparison
Open Charts BFNH vs CFEIYBanner chart's image
BioForce Nanosciences Holdings
Price$0.60
Change-$0.09 (-13.04%)
Volume$5.73K
Capitalization20.11M
China Feihe
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$344
Capitalization5.06B
BFNH vs CFEIY Comparison Chart in %
BFNH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CFEIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFNH vs. CFEIY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFNH is a Hold and CFEIY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BFNH: $0.60 vs. CFEIY: $5.24)
Brand notoriety: BFNH and CFEIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFNH: 288% vs. CFEIY: 72%
Market capitalization -- BFNH: $20.11M vs. CFEIY: $5.06B
BFNH [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $20.11M. CFEIY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $5.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $261.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFNH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCFEIY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BFNH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CFEIY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFEIY is a better buy in the long-term than BFNH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFNH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFEIY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFNH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CFEIY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFEIY is a better buy in the short-term than BFNH.

Price Growth

BFNH (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -13.58% price change this week, while CFEIY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.85% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFEIY($5.06B) has a higher market cap than BFNH($20.1M). BFNH YTD gains are higher at: 75.695 vs. CFEIY (-25.899). CFEIY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.99B vs. BFNH (-501.42K). CFEIY has higher revenues than BFNH: CFEIY (19.8B) vs BFNH (0).
BFNHCFEIYBFNH / CFEIY
Capitalization20.1M5.06B0%
EBITDA-501.42K4.99B-0%
Gain YTD75.695-25.899-292%
P/E RatioN/A12.84-
Revenue019.8B-
Total Cash905N/A-
Total Debt834KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFNH vs CFEIY: Fundamental Ratings
BFNH
CFEIY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1146
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10018
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6463
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1651
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFEIY's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BFNH (96). This means that CFEIY’s stock grew significantly faster than BFNH’s over the last 12 months.

CFEIY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BFNH (100). This means that CFEIY’s stock grew similarly to BFNH’s over the last 12 months.

CFEIY's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BFNH (100). This means that CFEIY’s stock grew significantly faster than BFNH’s over the last 12 months.

CFEIY's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as BFNH (64). This means that CFEIY’s stock grew similarly to BFNH’s over the last 12 months.

BFNH's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFEIY (51). This means that BFNH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFEIY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFNHCFEIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFNH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CFEIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDVNX8.180.07
+0.86%
MassMutual Diversified Value R3
FWCGX77.590.33
+0.43%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc529F3
MFWCX18.340.06
+0.33%
MFS Global Total Return C
TQGIX21.740.04
+0.18%
T. Rowe Price Integrated Global Eq I
GQIRX54.060.02
+0.04%
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq Inv

CFEIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFEIY has been loosely correlated with CHFLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFEIY jumps, then CHFLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFEIY
1D Price
Change %
CFEIY100%
N/A
CHFLF - CFEIY
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZHYBF - CFEIY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNFSA - CFEIY
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
CIADF - CFEIY
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.01%
NSRGY - CFEIY
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More