BFLBY
Price
$17.85
Change
-$0.40 (-2.19%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
3.44B
46 days until earnings call
CCOHF
Price
$1.57
Change
-$0.25 (-13.74%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
8.16B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFLBY vs CCOHF

Header iconBFLBY vs CCOHF Comparison
Open Charts BFLBY vs CCOHFBanner chart's image
Bilfinger SE
Price$17.85
Change-$0.40 (-2.19%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.44B
China State Construction International Holdings
Price$1.57
Change-$0.25 (-13.74%)
Volume$14K
Capitalization8.16B
BFLBY vs CCOHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BFLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCOHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFLBY vs. CCOHF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFLBY is a Hold and CCOHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BFLBY: $17.85 vs. CCOHF: $1.57)
Brand notoriety: BFLBY and CCOHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFLBY: 23% vs. CCOHF: 594%
Market capitalization -- BFLBY: $3.44B vs. CCOHF: $8.16B
BFLBY [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $3.44B. CCOHF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $8.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFLBY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCCOHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BFLBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CCOHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFLBY is a better buy in the long-term than CCOHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFLBY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCOHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFLBY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CCOHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCOHF is a better buy in the short-term than BFLBY.

Price Growth

BFLBY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CCOHF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -13.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +27.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +200.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +154.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFLBY is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+27.60% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCOHF($8.16B) has a higher market cap than BFLBY($3.44B). BFLBY has higher P/E ratio than CCOHF: BFLBY (15.57) vs CCOHF (6.63). BFLBY YTD gains are higher at: 95.633 vs. CCOHF (4.667).
BFLBYCCOHFBFLBY / CCOHF
Capitalization3.44B8.16B42%
EBITDA301MN/A-
Gain YTD95.6334.6672,049%
P/E Ratio15.576.63235%
Revenue5.22BN/A-
Total Cash533MN/A-
Total Debt370MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFLBY vs CCOHF: Fundamental Ratings
BFLBY
CCOHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
133
SMR RATING
1..100
5562
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCOHF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as BFLBY (42). This means that CCOHF’s stock grew similarly to BFLBY’s over the last 12 months.

BFLBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOHF (33). This means that BFLBY’s stock grew similarly to CCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

BFLBY's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOHF (62). This means that BFLBY’s stock grew similarly to CCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

BFLBY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOHF (38). This means that BFLBY’s stock grew similarly to CCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

BFLBY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCOHF (100). This means that BFLBY’s stock grew significantly faster than CCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFLBYCCOHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCOHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBCR28.650.45
+1.60%
Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF
FDEC46.460.14
+0.30%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Dec
FUND7.450.02
+0.27%
Sprott Focus Trust
GBLD17.420.02
+0.11%
Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF
IBHJ26.58N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds 2030 Term Hi Yld & IncETF

BFLBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BFLBY and KLRGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BFLBY and KLRGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFLBY
1D Price
Change %
BFLBY100%
N/A
KLRGF - BFLBY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCOHF - BFLBY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOUYY - BFLBY
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
BCKIY - BFLBY
7%
Poorly correlated
-4.96%
BIRDF - BFLBY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More

CCOHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOHF and BFLBY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOHF and BFLBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOHF
1D Price
Change %
CCOHF100%
N/A
BFLBY - CCOHF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCKIY - CCOHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-4.96%
BIRDF - CCOHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
BOUYY - CCOHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
CHYCY - CCOHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More