BFLBF
Price
$107.60
Change
-$1.21 (-1.11%)
Updated
Jul 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.88B
VCISF
Price
$134.13
Change
+$2.88 (+2.19%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
74.25B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFLBF vs VCISF

Header iconBFLBF vs VCISF Comparison
Open Charts BFLBF vs VCISFBanner chart's image
Bilfinger SE
Price$107.60
Change-$1.21 (-1.11%)
Volume$198
Capitalization3.88B
Vinci SA
Price$134.13
Change+$2.88 (+2.19%)
Volume$212
Capitalization74.25B
BFLBF vs VCISF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BFLBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VCISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFLBF vs. VCISF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFLBF is a Buy and VCISF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BFLBF: $107.60 vs. VCISF: $134.13)
Brand notoriety: BFLBF and VCISF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFLBF: 23% vs. VCISF: 6%
Market capitalization -- BFLBF: $3.88B vs. VCISF: $74.25B
BFLBF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $3.88B. VCISF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $74.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFLBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVCISF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFLBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VCISF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFLBF is a better buy in the long-term than VCISF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFLBF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VCISF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFLBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • VCISF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BFLBF is a better buy in the short-term than VCISF.

Price Growth

BFLBF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VCISF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -1.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +203.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.42% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VCISF($74.2B) has a higher market cap than BFLBF($3.89B). BFLBF has higher P/E ratio than VCISF: BFLBF (18.76) vs VCISF (13.87). BFLBF YTD gains are higher at: 125.364 vs. VCISF (33.476). VCISF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.2B vs. BFLBF (436M). VCISF has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. BFLBF (430M). BFLBF has less debt than VCISF: BFLBF (369M) vs VCISF (39.3B). VCISF has higher revenues than BFLBF: VCISF (73.7B) vs BFLBF (5.27B).
BFLBFVCISFBFLBF / VCISF
Capitalization3.89B74.2B5%
EBITDA436M13.2B3%
Gain YTD125.36433.476374%
P/E Ratio18.7613.87135%
Revenue5.27B73.7B7%
Total Cash430M16.3B3%
Total Debt369M39.3B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFLBF vs VCISF: Fundamental Ratings
BFLBF
VCISF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4992
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
145
SMR RATING
1..100
5499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
833
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BFLBF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as VCISF (49). This means that BFLBF’s stock grew similarly to VCISF’s over the last 12 months.

BFLBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VCISF (45). This means that BFLBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VCISF’s over the last 12 months.

BFLBF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VCISF (99). This means that BFLBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VCISF’s over the last 12 months.

BFLBF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as VCISF (55). This means that BFLBF’s stock grew similarly to VCISF’s over the last 12 months.

BFLBF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as VCISF (33). This means that BFLBF’s stock grew similarly to VCISF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFLBFVCISF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFLBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VCISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISCB62.990.79
+1.27%
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
JXX26.680.23
+0.88%
Janus Henderson Transformational Gr ETF
CAMX31.69N/A
N/A
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
SH38.27-0.32
-0.83%
ProShares Short S&P500
SIJ12.16-0.28
-2.27%
ProShares UltraShort Industrials

BFLBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BFLBF and EME have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BFLBF and EME's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFLBF
1D Price
Change %
BFLBF100%
N/A
EME - BFLBF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
ELWSF - BFLBF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VCISY - BFLBF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
WSPOF - BFLBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
VCISF - BFLBF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
More

VCISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VCISF and MYRG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VCISF and MYRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VCISF
1D Price
Change %
VCISF100%
+2.19%
MYRG - VCISF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
VCISY - VCISF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
BRAGF - VCISF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNISF - VCISF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BFLBF - VCISF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More