BFH
Price
$66.23
Change
-$0.75 (-1.12%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.09B
46 days until earnings call
PYPL
Price
$68.26
Change
-$0.20 (-0.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
65.21B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFH vs PYPL

Header iconBFH vs PYPL Comparison
Open Charts BFH vs PYPLBanner chart's image
Bread Financial Holdings
Price$66.23
Change-$0.75 (-1.12%)
Volume$348.7K
Capitalization3.09B
PayPal Holdings
Price$68.26
Change-$0.20 (-0.29%)
Volume$7.79M
Capitalization65.21B
BFH vs PYPL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFH vs. PYPL commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFH is a Hold and PYPL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BFH: $66.23 vs. PYPL: $68.26)
Brand notoriety: BFH and PYPL are both notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFH: 58% vs. PYPL: 72%
Market capitalization -- BFH: $3.09B vs. PYPL: $65.21B
BFH [@Savings Banks] is valued at $3.09B. PYPL’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $65.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $666.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePYPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BFH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PYPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFH is a better buy in the long-term than PYPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PYPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PYPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PYPL is a better buy in the short-term than BFH.

Price Growth

BFH (@Savings Banks) experienced а +0.06% price change this week, while PYPL (@Savings Banks) price change was -2.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

PYPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.52% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PYPL($65.2B) has a higher market cap than BFH($3.09B). PYPL has higher P/E ratio than BFH: PYPL (14.62) vs BFH (11.13). BFH YTD gains are higher at: 9.693 vs. PYPL (-20.023). BFH has less debt than PYPL: BFH (4.23B) vs PYPL (11.3B).
BFHPYPLBFH / PYPL
Capitalization3.09B65.2B5%
EBITDAN/A7.26B-
Gain YTD9.693-20.023-48%
P/E Ratio11.1314.6276%
RevenueN/A32.3B-
Total CashN/A10B-
Total Debt4.23B11.3B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFH vs PYPL: Fundamental Ratings
BFH
PYPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3355
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
841
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1071
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BFH's Valuation (76) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as PYPL (82). This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (100). This means that BFH’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's SMR Rating (8) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (41). This means that BFH’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as PYPL (61). This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (71). This means that BFH’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFHPYPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KMAR27.470.12
+0.44%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Mar
XBIL50.080.03
+0.06%
F/m US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF
BAMO31.71-0.01
-0.03%
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
BFEB46.26-0.09
-0.19%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Feb
MGK386.97-1.02
-0.26%
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF

BFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFH has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFH jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFH
1D Price
Change %
BFH100%
-1.12%
SYF - BFH
87%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
ENVA - BFH
77%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
AXP - BFH
76%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
OMF - BFH
75%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
ALLY - BFH
74%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
More

PYPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYPL has been loosely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PYPL jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PYPL
1D Price
Change %
PYPL100%
-0.29%
SYF - PYPL
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
COF - PYPL
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
AL - PYPL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
BFH - PYPL
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
OMF - PYPL
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
More