BFH
Price
$74.46
Change
+$18.65 (+33.42%)
Updated
Feb 3, 04:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.22B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OMF
Price
$65.64
Change
+$10.69 (+19.45%)
Updated
Feb 3, 10:54 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.69B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFH vs OMF

Header iconBFH vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts BFH vs OMFBanner chart's image
Bread Financial Holdings
Price$74.46
Change+$18.65 (+33.42%)
Volume$500
Capitalization3.22B
OneMain Holdings
Price$65.64
Change+$10.69 (+19.45%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.69B
BFH vs OMF Comparison Chart in %
BFH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFH vs. OMF commentary
Feb 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFH is a Hold and OMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 03, 2026
Stock price -- (BFH: $73.05 vs. OMF: $65.36)
Brand notoriety: BFH: Notable vs. OMF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFH: 103% vs. OMF: 118%
Market capitalization -- BFH: $3.22B vs. OMF: $7.69B
BFH [@Savings Banks] is valued at $3.22B. OMF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $7.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $642.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BFH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than BFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BFH is a better buy in the short-term than OMF.

Price Growth

BFH (@Savings Banks) experienced а +4.09% price change this week, while OMF (@Savings Banks) price change was -0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFH is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-1.68% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($7.7B) has a higher market cap than BFH($3.22B). OMF has higher P/E ratio than BFH: OMF (11.08) vs BFH (7.39). BFH YTD gains are higher at: -1.324 vs. OMF (-3.242). BFH has less debt than OMF: BFH (3.79B) vs OMF (22.3B). OMF has higher revenues than BFH: OMF (4.87B) vs BFH (3.8B).
BFHOMFBFH / OMF
Capitalization3.22B7.7B42%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.324-3.24241%
P/E Ratio7.3911.0867%
Revenue3.8B4.87B78%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.79B22.3B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFH vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
BFH
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6662
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7928
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8869
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4165

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BFH's Valuation (26) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as OMF (26) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFH (79) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFH’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as BFH (8) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to BFH’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as OMF (49) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as BFH (88) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to BFH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFHOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JIJRX17.410.11
+0.64%
JHancock International Dynamic Gr R6
ARSMX9.760.02
+0.21%
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
FDTRX197.72-0.11
-0.06%
Franklin DynaTech R6
TNXAX10.70-0.01
-0.13%
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income A
KNPAX110.48-3.65
-3.20%
Kinetics Paradigm Adv A

BFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFH has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFH jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFH
1D Price
Change %
BFH100%
+0.70%
SYF - BFH
85%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
OMF - BFH
81%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
COF - BFH
79%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
AXP - BFH
77%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
ALLY - BFH
73%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
More

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
-0.27%
SYF - OMF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
AXP - OMF
84%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
COF - OMF
83%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
BFH - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
ALLY - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
More