BFH
Price
$66.98
Change
+$1.11 (+1.69%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.07B
49 days until earnings call
OMF
Price
$62.59
Change
+$0.55 (+0.89%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.37B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFH vs OMF

Header iconBFH vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts BFH vs OMFBanner chart's image
Bread Financial Holdings
Price$66.98
Change+$1.11 (+1.69%)
Volume$1.88K
Capitalization3.07B
OneMain Holdings
Price$62.59
Change+$0.55 (+0.89%)
Volume$7.06K
Capitalization7.37B
BFH vs OMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFH vs. OMF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFH is a Buy and OMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BFH: $65.87 vs. OMF: $62.03)
Brand notoriety: BFH: Notable vs. OMF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFH: 59% vs. OMF: 106%
Market capitalization -- BFH: $3.07B vs. OMF: $7.37B
BFH [@Savings Banks] is valued at $3.07B. OMF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $7.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BFH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than BFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BFH and OMF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BFH (@Savings Banks) experienced а +0.78% price change this week, while OMF (@Savings Banks) price change was +1.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.51% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($7.37B) has a higher market cap than BFH($3.07B). OMF (11.18) and BFH (11.07) have similar P/E ratio . OMF YTD gains are higher at: 26.110 vs. BFH (9.097). BFH has less debt than OMF: BFH (4.23B) vs OMF (22.1B).
BFHOMFBFH / OMF
Capitalization3.07B7.37B42%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.09726.11035%
P/E Ratio11.0711.1899%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt4.23B22.1B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFH vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
BFH
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1925
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6619
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1035
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (22) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFH (76) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFH’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFH (66) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFH’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as BFH (8) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to BFH’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as OMF (43) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as OMF (35) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFHOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QBF26.800.32
+1.20%
Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Flr ETF-Qt
CII22.340.12
+0.54%
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund Inc
DYFI23.300.04
+0.15%
IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
RSSL91.77-0.11
-0.12%
Global X Russell 2000 ETF
FDIG39.97-0.82
-2.01%
Fidelity Crypto Industry&DgtlPymntsETF

BFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFH has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFH jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFH
1D Price
Change %
BFH100%
+0.58%
SYF - BFH
87%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
ENVA - BFH
77%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
AXP - BFH
76%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
OMF - BFH
75%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
ALLY - BFH
74%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
More

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+1.51%
ENVA - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
COF - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
SYF - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
BFH - OMF
75%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
AL - OMF
74%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
More