BFH
Price
$62.76
Change
+$1.34 (+2.18%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
31 days until earnings call
OMF
Price
$51.91
Change
+$0.73 (+1.43%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
44 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BFH vs OMF

Header iconBFH vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts BFH vs OMFBanner chart's image
Bread Financial Holdings
Price$62.76
Change+$1.34 (+2.18%)
Volume$1.3M
CapitalizationN/A
OneMain Holdings
Price$51.91
Change+$0.73 (+1.43%)
Volume$1.49M
CapitalizationN/A
BFH vs OMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFH vs. OMF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFH is a Hold and OMF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BFH: $62.76 vs. OMF: $51.91)
Brand notoriety: BFH: Notable vs. OMF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFH: 168% vs. OMF: 143%
Market capitalization -- BFH: $1.84B vs. OMF: $6.02B
BFH [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.84B. OMF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BFH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than BFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the short-term than BFH.

Price Growth

BFH (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -3.85% price change this week, while OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -6.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFH is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-2.27% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than BFH($1.84B). OMF has higher P/E ratio than BFH: OMF (9.44) vs BFH (2.44). BFH YTD gains are higher at: 94.232 vs. OMF (14.649). BFH has less debt than OMF: BFH (5.44B) vs OMF (19.8B). BFH (4.3B) and OMF (4.28B) have equivalent revenues.
BFHOMFBFH / OMF
Capitalization1.84B6.02B31%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD94.23214.649643%
P/E Ratio2.449.4426%
Revenue4.3B4.28B100%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt5.44B19.8B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFH vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
BFH
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2588
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10023
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
526
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for BFH (93) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than BFH’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for BFH (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than BFH’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's SMR Rating (7) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as OMF (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as OMF (50) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as OMF (26) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFHOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

BFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFH has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFH jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFH
1D Price
Change %
BFH100%
+2.18%
SYF - BFH
75%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
ALLY - BFH
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
NAVI - BFH
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
COF - BFH
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
OMF - BFH
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
More

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+1.43%
SYF - OMF
69%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
COF - OMF
69%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
DFS - OMF
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
SLM - OMF
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
BFH - OMF
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.18%
More