BFH
Price
$76.63
Change
+$0.13 (+0.17%)
Updated
Feb 5, 02:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.37B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFIN
Price
$10.33
Change
-$0.04 (-0.39%)
Updated
Feb 5, 03:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
240.36M
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFH vs MFIN

Header iconBFH vs MFIN Comparison
Open Charts BFH vs MFINBanner chart's image
Bread Financial Holdings
Price$76.63
Change+$0.13 (+0.17%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.37B
Medallion Financial
Price$10.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.39%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization240.36M
BFH vs MFIN Comparison Chart in %
BFH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFH vs. MFIN commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFH is a StrongBuy and MFIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BFH: $76.50 vs. MFIN: $10.37)
Brand notoriety: BFH: Notable vs. MFIN: Not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFH: 104% vs. MFIN: 60%
Market capitalization -- BFH: $3.37B vs. MFIN: $240.36M
BFH [@Savings Banks] is valued at $3.37B. MFIN’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $240.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $634.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $20.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMFIN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BFH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MFIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFIN is a better buy in the long-term than BFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFIN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MFIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFIN is a better buy in the short-term than BFH.

Price Growth

BFH (@Savings Banks) experienced а +12.17% price change this week, while MFIN (@Savings Banks) price change was +5.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFH is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

MFIN is expected to report earnings on May 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-2.88% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFH($3.37B) has a higher market cap than MFIN($240M). BFH has higher P/E ratio than MFIN: BFH (7.74) vs MFIN (6.04). BFH YTD gains are higher at: 3.336 vs. MFIN (0.777). MFIN has less debt than BFH: MFIN (302M) vs BFH (3.79B). BFH has higher revenues than MFIN: BFH (3.8B) vs MFIN (230M).
BFHMFINBFH / MFIN
Capitalization3.37B240M1,406%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.3360.777429%
P/E Ratio7.746.04128%
Revenue3.8B230M1,650%
Total CashN/A15.8M-
Total Debt3.79B302M1,254%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFH vs MFIN: Fundamental Ratings
BFH
MFIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7110
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8028
SMR RATING
1..100
827
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8136
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFIN's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BFH (28) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MFIN’s stock grew similarly to BFH’s over the last 12 months.

MFIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFH (80) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MFIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFH’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's SMR Rating (8) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as MFIN (27) in the null industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to MFIN’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as MFIN (54) in the null industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to MFIN’s over the last 12 months.

MFIN's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFH (81) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MFIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFHMFIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BMLQF0.410.01
+2.00%
Boab Metals Ltd.
FGROF2.50N/A
N/A
Firstgroup PLC
GFIOF53.00-0.29
-0.54%
Gold Fields Ltd.
VBREY11.39-0.24
-2.11%
Vibra Energia SA
ECTM0.60-0.02
-3.19%
ECA Marcellus Trust I

BFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFH has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFH jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFH
1D Price
Change %
BFH100%
+1.46%
SYF - BFH
85%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
OMF - BFH
81%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
COF - BFH
79%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
ALLY - BFH
73%
Closely correlated
+3.04%
ENVA - BFH
67%
Closely correlated
-2.11%
More

MFIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFIN has been loosely correlated with BFH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFIN jumps, then BFH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFIN
1D Price
Change %
MFIN100%
N/A
BFH - MFIN
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
NNI - MFIN
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
AGM - MFIN
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
SYF - MFIN
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
ENVA - MFIN
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
More