Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs RPMGX
BFGFX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs RPMGX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$51.93
Change+$0.51 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.92B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$103.81
Change+$0.92 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
BFGFX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. RPMGX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. BFGFX (2.92B). BFGFX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFGFX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: BFGFX (17 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). BFGFX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. BFGFX (6.00). BFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: BFGFX (2000) vs RPMGX (2500). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.03 vs. RPMGX (-10.14). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.73 vs. RPMGX (-9.79).
| BFGFX | RPMGX | BFGFX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.75 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.75 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.989 | 4.091 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.92B | 25.6B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.03 | -10.14 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.56 | 8.19 | 752% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.73 | -9.79 | -314% |
| Returns for 10 years | 290.15 | 27.43 | 1,058% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers