Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs PAMCX
BFGFX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs PAMCX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$58.61
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.43B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$92.38
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
BFGFX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. PAMCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Buy and PAMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. BFGFX (3.43B). BFGFX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFGFX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: BFGFX (18 years) vs PAMCX (26 years). BFGFX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. BFGFX (6.00). BFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: BFGFX (2000) vs PAMCX (2500). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.87 vs. PAMCX (-3.64). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.71 vs. PAMCX (-15.22).
| BFGFX | PAMCX | BFGFX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.01 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.01 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.147 | -1.682 | -1,436% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.43B | 25.6B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.87 | -3.64 | -573% |
| Returns for 3 years | 108.13 | 9.56 | 1,131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.71 | -15.22 | -248% |
| Returns for 10 years | 341.37 | 27.67 | 1,234% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers