Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs FSMAX
BFGFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs FSMAX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$58.61
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.43B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.71
Change-$0.26 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
BFGFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. BFGFX (3.43B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BFGFX: FSMAX (0.43) vs BFGFX (0.00). BFGFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BFGFX (18 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BFGFX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. BFGFX (6.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFGFX: FSMAX (0) vs BFGFX (2000). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.87 vs. FSMAX (11.05). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.71 vs. FSMAX (26.24).
| BFGFX | FSMAX | BFGFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.04 | 3,743% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.04 | 3,743% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.147 | 13.303 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.43B | 41B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.87 | 11.05 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 108.13 | 66.56 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.71 | 26.24 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 341.37 | 119.46 | 286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers