Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGBX vs RGAGX
BFGBX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BFGBX vs RGAGX
BlackRock Capital Appreciation K
Price$46.40
Change+$0.39 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.82B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$89.28
Change+$1.12 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
BFGBX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGBX vs. RGAGX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGBX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. BFGBX (3.82B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BFGBX: RGAGX (0.58) vs BFGBX (0.00). BFGBX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BFGBX (28 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). BFGBX (0.64) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). BFGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFGBX: RGAGX (250) vs BFGBX (5000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.02 vs. BFGBX (5.79). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.92 vs. BFGBX (15.20).
| BFGBX | RGAGX | BFGBX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.30 | 207% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.30 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.950 | 18.256 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.82B | 337B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | 12.02 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.61 | 73.65 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.20 | 41.92 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.61 | 103.73 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement